TOP 9 TYPES OF REVIEWS - LITERATURE - 2024

The main review types are critical, literary or narrative, comparative, mapping, mixed, panoramic, cutting edge, systemic, and general reviews. The review is a text of variable length in which information that has already been published is discussed.

Reviews can be made on a single text, on several texts by the same author, on several texts on the same subject, on several texts from the same historical period, among others.

Sometimes reviews follow the pattern of a synopsis; This means that they offer a short introduction to the work reviewed without going into the details of the development and the conclusion.

Other types of reviews are like summaries and offer concise information about each of the parts of the work reviewed, including the conclusion.

A third type of reviews follows the structure of the synthesis that, unlike summaries, reorganizes, analyzes and critiques the information presented.

In this type of review, new interpretations of various texts are offered, various points of view are combined, the evolution or absence of evolution that occurs in a specific area of ​​knowledge is evaluated.

The latter type of reviews evaluate sources. This is why the review author sometimes advises readers as to whether the reviewed text is relevant or relevant.

In this sense, reviews are beneficial to individuals who have limited time to conduct research. They are also of benefit to professionals, since it allows them to keep up to date.

Main types of reviews

Critical review

The critical review aims to critically analyze the work reviewed. Thus, this type of review shows that the writer of the review has conducted intensive research with respect to the reviewed work.

Not only has it been limited to summarizing and describing it, but it also includes different degrees of analysis, evaluates the quality of the work, correctly integrates the opinions of various authors, and innovates conceptually.

Critical reviews differ from essays and other research because they do not seek to develop a new argument, but rather to discuss, synthesize, analyze, and summarize the information offered by other sources.

Rather, investigations offer new bits of information and sometimes include reviews of other texts.

The critical review assesses the way in which the author addresses his audience, the appropriateness of the language used, the context in which the work is immersed and the approach taken by the author.

In this sense, critical review is beneficial as it provides an opportunity to assess the value of a written text.

Literary review or narrative review

Literary reviews are texts that are intended to evaluate literary texts. Usually these are recent texts.

The literary review usually establishes points of comparison. For example: compare the current work of the author with one of his previous works or compare the reviewed work with another contemporary work or with a similar theme.

Contrary to what many might think, the literary review should not be based on the point of view of the person reviewing, but should be an objective text in which the work, its context and its relationship with the work are critically analyzed. Author; otherwise, it will be an opinion piece.

Comparative review

The comparative review can be a literary or critical review in which two or more texts are analyzed and synthesized.

Mapping overview or systematic mapping

The purpose of this type of review is to classify and categorize existing texts into groups, by topic, by year of publication, by historical context, by country of origin, by author, among others.

It is a type of review both quantitative and qualitative. It includes descriptive and expository texts, as well as graphs and tables to facilitate the understanding of the categories.

Systematic mapping offers advantages to researchers because it allows the works to be classified within specific contexts, which would facilitate the development of future works.

However, this type of review is really simple and lacks the analysis that characterizes other types of reviews, so it is usually used as a support for further research and not as a final work.

Mixed review

Mixed review refers to any review that combines multiple review or information gathering methods.

In general, one of the review methods used is literary, which was mentioned above. Other methods included are interviews and statistics.

In this sense, the mixed review integrates qualitative and quantitative methods. Therefore, it includes descriptive and expository texts, as well as tables and graphs.

Panoramic review

The panoramic review, also called “overview” is a generic term that is used to speak of summaries about texts written in a certain area.

In general, medical text reviews are called an overview. This type of review allows a quick understanding of the text and is valuable for people who are approaching the subject for the first time.

Avant-garde review

This type of review refers to current topics, usually contemporary technological advances.

It can offer diverse perspectives on the topic, highlight issues of importance, and lay the foundation for further study.

In this sense, this type of review is important for people seeking to identify the potential of the research that is currently being carried out.

Systematic review

The systematic review is one of the most common types of reviews. This is the result of a systematic research and synthesis process; it integrates more than one text, so it offers strong evidence.

General review

The overview is a compilation of evidence from multiple sources on a specific topic.

It focuses on the general aspects of the subject at hand and highlights important advances. This type of review can refer not only to the material provided by other research but also to the results offered by other reviews.

References

1. Types of Reviews. Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from guides.mclibrary.duke.edu.
2. MJ Grant (2009). A typology of reviews. Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from onlinelibrary.wiley.om
3. What are the types of revieew? Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from listqbexamcertification.com
4. Natal, G. (2011). Lit Review Types. Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from libguides.utoledo.edu
5. Types of Review. Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from umas.edu
6. Types of Review. Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from gcu.ac.uk
7. Different Types of literature review. Retrieved on June 20, 2017, from libraryguides.griffith.edu.au.