- characteristics
- Unidirectional
- Advantage
- Organizational discipline
- Efficiency
- Effective communication of objectives
- Ease of delegation
- Disadvantages
- Distortion
- Slow feedback
- Interpretive problems
- Deterioration of the relationship
- Reduces motivation
- Examples
- Organizations
- References
Top- down communication, from management to employees, occurs when information and messages flow down through the formal chain of command or hierarchical structure of an organization.
In other words, messages and orders start at the higher levels of the organizational hierarchy and work their way to the lower levels. Responses to downstream communications go the same way.
Source: pixabay.com
Top-down communication is senior management's process of reaching conclusions, which change or improve the workplace or business systems. These findings are subsequently communicated to employees, who work towards the goals, with other employees or individually.
Some lower-level managers can provide information on how to achieve the end goal. However, they may not have the authority to change policies, without the approval of the highest level of management.
This type of communication involves managing a project. That is, the manager has complete control over the delegation of tasks, the establishment of the project schedule and deadlines.
characteristics
Downward communication is helpful for managers to inform employees of the organization's vision, mission, goals, objectives, policies, and procedures.
It can take the form of oral communication: face-to-face conversation, meetings, speeches, conferences, etc. or written communication: manual, notices, circulars, digital news, warnings, etc.
Downward communication can increase the use of specific programs in the workplace, by making employees aware of their availability, clearly explaining how to access and use services, and showing that management supports and values those programs.
With downward communication, it is up to the manager to fully discern the strengths and weaknesses of each team member and delegate the appropriate tasks to them.
Unidirectional
While downstream communication can sometimes invite a response, it is generally one-way rather than reciprocal - the higher-level communicator does not invite or expect a response from the lower-level recipient.
Differences in experience, knowledge, authority levels, and status can make it very likely that the sender and the recipient do not share the same assumptions or understanding of the context, which can lead to misunderstanding or misinterpretation of messages.
Ensuring that downward communication is effective is not necessarily an easy task.
Creating clear and unambiguous communications while maintaining a respectful tone can overcome these problems and increase effectiveness.
Advantage
All aspects must be taken into consideration, especially how a decision will affect employees. This is why downward communication is especially beneficial for organizations with talented and knowledgeable leaders.
Organizational discipline
Downward communication follows the hierarchy of the organization. This means that organizational discipline and member compliance is much easier to maintain.
Efficiency
Downward communication provides subordinates with the necessary directions, commands, instructions, and explanations on various complex problems. This ultimately increases the efficiency of the employees.
It offers efficiencies because instructions and information come from power sources, who can coordinate activities from the top of the organization.
Effective communication of objectives
Top management can easily communicate goals and assign responsibilities for achieving those goals.
Making decisions from the top allows leaders to be clear about goals and expectations. It also gives employees more time to focus on their work tasks, rather than attending meetings where possible directions for the company are discussed.
Ease of delegation
Delegation is much easier if it comes directly from the vertical communication structure that the chain of command represents.
When a strong leader is at the forefront, managers can take charge quickly and effectively. Also assign tasks to teams or employees and set solid deadlines.
Disadvantages
With only top executives making decisions, their conclusions can be viewed as lacking in creativity and detrimental to overall performance.
Distortion
Top-down communications can get distorted as they progress through multiple levels of the organization.
Slow feedback
It takes time for messages to travel down the entire organization, then up the organization, then back down again. This means that feedback can be slow, resulting in problems, especially in a dynamic environment.
Interpretive problems
Downward communication presents interpretation problems due to the distortion effect and slow feedback for the clarification of the message.
Deterioration of the relationship
Having a great dependence on downward communication deteriorates the worker-management relationship. This is because it does not provide any direct communication scope between them.
Reduces motivation
Given the time that communication takes and the problem with distorted messages, downward communication can have a negative impact on organizational motivation.
When used correctly, downward communication can help establish a clear vision for the direction of the company. But he can easily be seen as bossy or dictatorial.
Particularly with a weak leader, employees can grow resentful and challenge one-sided decisions. Therefore, downstream communication is not the best for companies struggling to implement change effectively.
Examples
Examples of downward communication include explaining the mission and strategy of an organization or explaining the organizational vision. Effective downward communication thus gives employees a clear understanding of the message they have received.
Whether informative or persuasive, effective downstream communication causes recipients to take action or behave in accordance with communicators' expectations.
At work, managers' orientations to employees are the most basic form of downward communication. These can be written manuals, instructions, notes, policies, or oral presentations.
Another example of downward communication is a board of directors instructing management to take specific action.
Organizations
Most organizations operate with some type of downward communication. Some well-known examples are the Trump Organization, Helmsley Hotels, and Martha Stewart Living.
These companies are good examples because they were led by three highly powerful and knowledgeable individuals, who were able to successfully make all the decisions about the direction of the company.
Companies in highly regulated industries are also more likely to use downstream communication, such as banks and financial institutions.
References
- Micah Harper (2015). Top-down vs. Bottom-up Management Styles. Touro University Worldwide. Taken from: tuw.edu.
- Study (2018). Downward Communication: Definition, Advantages & Disadvantages. Taken from: study.com.
- Lumen (2018). Management and Communication. Taken from: courses.lumenlearning.com.
- Surbhi (2017). Difference Between Upward and Downward Communication. Key Differences. Taken from: keydifferences.com.
- The Business Communication (2018). Advantage And Disadvantages of downward communication. Taken from: thebusinesscommunication.com.